A.J. Allmendinger's car sat quiet across the frontstretch of New Hampshire Motor Speedway with the white flag waving as he flipped the car's starter, trying to crank the engine. Meanwhile, leaders Mark Martin, Denny Hamlin and Juan Pablo Montoya scrambled for position on the final lap through turns 3 and 4 as the flagman prepared to wave the checkered flag. In a flash, it looked like the finish of the first race of the Chase was going to end in a crushing fashion as Allmendinger sat helplessly in peril.
At the last possible second, NASCAR threw the caution to avoid the collision but also provoked a new topic of discussion for the coming week: when exactly is the best -- and safest -- time to put out the yellow flag on a race's final lap?
Drivers were certainly a confused over the matter, but NASCAR stood firm behind their call. According to the NASCAR Scene, the policy observed by the sanctioning body has the objective of allowing the finish to transpire normally as long as they can safely avoid or will not catch the potentially caution-causing danger.
Jeff Gordon probably summed it up best when he described the communication between himself and his spotter -- generally the person who relays information over the radio when a caution waves. Confusion was the name of the game.NASCAR Vice President of Competition Robin Pemberton indicated that NASCAR did everything it could to finish Sunday's Sprint Cup race under green-flag conditions.
"We were waiting to see if the 44 car [of Allmendinger] could get going and get out of the way, and we realized there was a potential blocking of part of the race track," Pemberton said. "You know when the cars are going to get there, and you wait as long as you can to try to not affect the outcome of a race. We felt like we had adequate time when we threw the caution."
Pemberton said NASCAR often waits as long as possible throughout a race.
"We don't like the race to end under caution," Pemberton said. "We felt like we gave enough time for safety's sake, and it is what it is. I believe we wait as long as we can. There are times during the middle of the race when a car will turn around and we bide some time to see if it gets going. It happens quite a bit. It just gets more noticed when it's the last lap of the race."
"All I know is my spotter was saying there was a car down low on the front straightaway stopped, and I never heard them say, 'Caution,'" said Gordon after his 15th-place finish. "So everybody was still going, and I saw the caution out of the corner of my eye. I said, 'I never heard the caution' and he said, 'That's because it didn't come out until just now' and I was surprised by that."
Interestingly enough, a very similar situation at New Hampshire in 2003 was the last domino to fall in NASCAR's former policy to allow all-out racing back to the start/finish line when the caution waves. In that instance, Dale Jarrett spun in a very similar fashion on the frontstretch and barely avoided a broadside impact as the field raced for position back to the line.
Just weeks later, NASCAR adopted the current policy that freezes scoring at the point of caution and penalizes drivers who didn't slow to a cautious pace.
The idea of letting drivers race back to the checkered flag is certainly one that needs to take precedence in this discussion. And with that in mind, making the decision from the control tower on when to throw a caution flagis a tough one to make.
Most folks would have guessed Allmendinger would have gotten his car at least cranked and rolling down the frontstretch by the time the leaders were crossing the finish line. But sometimes, a hot race car doesn't start immediately after going for a spin -- something that isn't the fault of a driver.
Knowing that, and seeing that the field was bearing down on turn 3 while Allmendinger, NASCAR probably should have thrown the caution a few seconds earlier. Armchair race director decisions are much easier, though, after seeing how the original played out.
Racing to checkered flag makes the headlines, but Sunday's finish was probably a bit too close for comfort for everyone -- especially Allmendinger.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
9-21-2009 @ 3:32AM
anzajoe said...
I AM STUNT about nobody yet saying that NAZCAR threw another phantom caution.
I guess this time the debri on the track was big enough for everyone to see it.
OH yes the debri was AJ ALMOND DIGGER huge COT,LOL. works for me...nzcr14 said.
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 7:09AM
clearhoads7 said...
I USED TO BE A FAN OF NASCAR I WATCH INDY CAR RACING NOW AND I WONDER HOW MANY FANS THEY HAVE LOST WITH THERE CHANGING OF THE RULES AT LEASR WITH INDY THEY GET TO RACE,AND SINCE THEY PUT TOYOTA IN IT WAS AND IS A DISATER.
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 9:22AM
Jim said...
I am a fan of all kinds of racing.
I am also a driver in a road racing series.
The hundreds of rules, regulations, and decisions that have to be made is mind boggling. I think that all sanctioning bodies do the best that they can do for the fans as well as the racers. And yes, sometimes mistakes are made but it still amounts to a judgement call. We as fans can always sit back after the race and second guess the calls that are made but even at that we probably wouldn't have all the facts leading up to the decisions that are made. I know one thing for certain. The safety of the drivers comes first and the fans enjoyment second. As it should be.
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 9:34AM
Kim said...
I guess the question that comes to mind would be, "How would you (other drivers) feel if you were the car stalled near the finish line with forty other cars baring down on you at almost 200 mph?" I am the first to be critical of A.J. as I refer to him as "A.J. I'm a Dinger" because he seems like such a dingbat, but in this case, I must defend NASCAR'S judgement call. A.J. being completely stopped with no momentum and dozens of other cars baring down on him with full momentum, could have been disasterous for both A.J. and the other drivers.
Kim
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 10:44AM
madasonwh said...
Good Job David Reutimann !!!!!!!!!!
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 11:15AM
robert said...
Robin Pemberton said " we were waiting to see if the 44 car could get going and out of the way" . . . . . Do What? This isnt daytona or talladega where you have room for those kind of cautions. The only thing im "waiting to see" is some consistency in throwing a yellow flag! Several races ago ( i forget the track at the moment) david ragan brushes the wall and keeps going and they throw a yellow, yet a few laps later kyle busch slams the wall so hard his right front tire locks up, throwing sparks and metal as he tries to hit pit road, and no yellow? What was NASCAR waiting on in those two cases?
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 11:31AM
Taglia said...
I believe what NASCAR was trying to do was let the race finish without the perception that they gave the race to Mark. Since the field had no problems getting past the spin, pulling the yellow in turn three was a good call. With the yellow out when the cars hit turn three, the spotters would have plenty of time to let the drivers know where AJ was and avoid a collision. At the same time, they let Mark and JPM battle through turns one and tow and down the back straight.
Look, if you’re NASCAR you’re damned if you do, and damned if you don’t. In my book, they did just fine on Sunday.
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 12:53PM
OINKJOHNSON2 said...
All things considered, I believe NASCAR handled the situation correctly. They wanted the race to end under the checkered flag and gave Montoya the maximum time to catch/pass Martin, and then, when Almindinger could not get his car re-started, finally put out the caution. Cutting it close? Yes. Endangering Almindinger? No. Good race!
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 8:42PM
dongo4345 said...
kim whats up with you aj is a good lil driver and will win someday soon nascar did good by throwing the yellow because if u remember when dj was stopped in the track at some race and started to unbuckle they were racing back to the line and he could have been killed hats off to them for that rule
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 7:35AM
Kim said...
With all do respect, A.J. might be a nice guy and he seems like he might be just that, but his driving is less to be desired. I have yet to see any flashes of greatness from this kid and like I said, think he's a bit of a dingbat. He always seems to be in a wreck, the one causing a wreck or one of the ones that cannot avoid a wreck. JMO of course!
Kim
9-21-2009 @ 10:32PM
Eddie said...
Myself i thought it was a great call.I was at the race and sitting at turn 4 and u couldnt see a thing with all the smoke so they probably had no idea were the car was sitting.Caution or no caution Martin had the win
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 12:47AM
Tracy G Smith said...
GO MARK MARTIN!! All things considered.Caution or no caution Martin had the win.Good call NASCAR!
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 1:00AM
Susan said...
I've read several reports from Monday that Nascar has 4 new witnesses to Mayfield drug use. The AP and news outlets are also reporting that Nascar are asking the court to issue a psych evaluation.
I am surprised that ABC went to infomercial after Sunday's race. It was the first race in the chase after all. It also seems that a Motorsports Fanhouse website would also have a Monday follow up to Sunday's race.
Just saying.
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 8:16AM
illsell4u said...
Susan, when it all comes out in trial and the trial is over we will probably all find out that Mayfield does have a drug problem. But it would be nice for a change if the players would make their respective cases in court instead of in the media. For the most part Mayfield has been the one responsible for making this a public case.
As for the TV coverage, I am not sure what you were expecting. It is ABC after all. One result of the chase format is that if your driver is not a part of it you can forget hearing his name mentioned the rest of the season. He could be winning the race and it is now insignificant in their minds.
mbl
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 8:59AM
Kim said...
I agree! Bring back NBC anyday over ABC and ESPN. I am baffled every year by the complaints from fans about the FOX coverage. They have the best coverage of all the networks as far as Nascar is concerned, IMO.
As for this race, I missed the entire second half, so have no idea what happened. What happened to Jr.? Last I saw, he was running in the top five and charging to the front. What happened with Reuittiman? Lots of comments about him?
Susan, I agree. It does seem like the media coverage and stories have been lacking as of late. I just read an article on SI.COM that speaks of issues with the new RPM merger. Interesting stuff.
Kim
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 9:15AM
illsell4u said...
I think the post race interview is still up at Nascar.com with JR. I was a bit shocked by his rare loss of composure but I guess frustration is setting in. Personally, I would have given his statements on Ruetiman more weight if Ruetiman were not higher in points than Jr. Jr has no room to criticise a driver with a better record than he has this year. Like I said, it was a very UN-Jr like interview.
9-22-2009 @ 9:11AM
bigfoose13 said...
mayfield should just tell everybody he is a drughead so we could all just move on and he could stop making a fool of himself and all involved.
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 10:15AM
Ron said...
Yes every driver should carry a list containing what point position all drivers are in and in the event of an on track encounter they can check this list before climbing out of the car and if they are interviewed about the encounter they should say "sorry, I cant say anything negative because so and so is ahead of me in points" LOL Give me a damn break. You running for stupidist post of the year Mike?
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 11:31AM
illsell4u said...
Out of the many, I am sure any one of my posts could be an honorable mention. I am sure you watched the race, Ron. Would you not agree it was a different side of an interview with Jr we are accustomed to seeing? I just thought for him to come out and say "everyone knows he can't handle the corners" is a bit much considering the guy is actually ahead of him in points. There is no question who caused the wreck and as usual the innocent party paid the price.
What if Ruetiman had said afterwards "everyone knows Jr goes backwards at the end of the race, I was just trying to get past him."? Would that have been ok too?
mbl
Reply
9-22-2009 @ 1:01PM
Ron said...
I know all too well where you were going with this constant criticism of this driver. You should be happy that he got taken out and left it at that. He wasn't "going backwards" by the way he was running in the top five most of the day when he got taken out. What did you expect him to say? He put me in the wall but thats ok because he's having a better year? Criticize him all you want but at least have something to say with some substance instead of sounding off with every little petty thing you can think of. On second thought why don't you get off the guy's ass for awhile. It's getting monotonous. You surely have figured out by now that this sport carries a lot of emotion and when some asshole sticks a mike in your face after a very emotional event they are getting exactly what they want. Don't you get that?
Reply