For those that question NASCAR's race shows -- the people who criticize white-checkered finishes, single file parades and races that are agonizingly too long -- the antidote comes Sunday on the beautiful 1.9-mile road course built into the winding, hills of Northern California wine country.Road course racing is real racing, the true test of driver talent.
And NASCAR's Sprint Cup Series could stand a few more.
This form of competition requires not only a fast car and good car set-up, but employs different strategies and offers a stage for simmering rivalries and the kind of door-to-door, hard-nosed racing that most NASCAR fans favor.
Best of all, it takes drivers out of their comfort zone. It challenges them in ways they aren't used to and that creates a suspense and sense of excitement that even NASCAR can't manufacturer.
The new double-file restarts will certainly make this edition of road course racing more interesting. NASCAR's best-ever at it, Jeff Gordon, said he expects "havoc" on Sunday at Infineon Raceway.
And just the anticipation of that extra unknown increases the intrigue.
Road courses separate the men from the boys. It's where you see the real racers -- drivers like Gordon, Tony Stewart, Mark Martin, Robby Gordon, Juan Pablo Montoya and Kyle Busch -- put on a clinic. You've actually got to drive the car. It's a test, not an exercise.
For all the wins he's collected driving in different NASCAR series, it was when Busch won both road course races last year -- at Sonoma, Calif. and Watkins Glen, N.Y. -- that ultimately proved to many what a bona fide racing talent he is.
The drivers that protest loudest about adding more road courses are the ones without game.
Say what you want about the IndyCar Series, but part of what makes its championship so competitive and compelling is that it holds events on speedways, short ovals, permanent road courses and street circuits. Imagine how much more interesting NASCAR would be with a schedule as diverse.
Road course racing also represents a prime opportunity for NASCAR to expand into new markets, all without asking taxpayers to foot a hundred million dollar bill for yet another new cookie cutter 1.5-mile speedway.
NASCAR's sister company, International Speedway Corporation, spent a lot of money and time outside Seattle unsuccessfully lobbying to build a track that would have given stock cars a platform in the race-starved Northwest -- a region that has produced two of the Cup Series biggest stars, Kasey Kahne and Greg Biffle.
A solution would be bringing the Cup Series to the scenic Portland International Raceway course, a popular venue that hosted some of the all-time best Indy car road races and would draw sizable crowds from Oregon to Canada to Idaho.
How about losing one of the Pocono, Dover or New Hampshire dates and take the series to Mid-Ohio and/or Elkhart Lake, Wisc. Instead of two races at Atlanta Motor Speedway, split the difference -- hold one race at the speedway and one at Road Atlanta.
I realize the audacity of these suggestions. The logistics of getting the tracks NASCAR race ready along with territorial power struggles with speedway owners would force NASCAR to anger some longtime venues. But it would simultaneously add countless new fans, tap under-served race markets and break up the monotony of turning left.
In this free-wheeling, diversity-driven, open-minded era of "change," why not consider some drastic new ideas.
For years, I've argued the Chase for the Championship should be representative all of NASCAR's tracks. The Chase needs a road course, not what seems like 250,000 miles at Dover, Delaware.
Until then, pour a glass of Cabernet on Sunday and enjoy one of the two real races of the season.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
6-18-2009 @ 6:33PM
stanger58 said...
AMEN!! Oval racing is for cars, road course racing is for DRIVERS! Road America, Mid-Ohio, Road Atlanta, Mosport and even Portand International would all be great rotational tracks to add to the schedule. Which begs the question: Why DOES the schedule have to be the same year after year? NASCLONE needs a shot in the arm, so why not mix it up and rotate some more of North America's great road courses into the mix. BRING it I say!
Reply
6-18-2009 @ 6:37PM
illsell4u said...
Woo HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Go Holly Go. if you had only said to dump the restrictor plates that would have been the icing on top. How do you call it racing when you put the equivilent of a governor on the car? I realize those tracks have a long history in Nascar but even the drivers know restrictor plate racing the COT is a recipe for disaster. The only arguement I can understand Nascar making for NOT having more of these is that I have yet to see a road course where you can seat 100,000 fans.
mbl
Reply
6-18-2009 @ 7:26PM
Blondie said...
Road racing is really cool and the racing is really hard but it's not really spectator friendly. I had some of the best seats at Sonoma last year and I still could only see half the race. Ovals, especially Dega, are really spectator friendly. I do think that is something that has to be taken into consideration.
Reply
6-18-2009 @ 7:28PM
Blondie said...
...well Dega isn't round but it is really easy to see...
Reply
6-18-2009 @ 7:57PM
Ron said...
I agree. You can't get 100,000 people to watch a road course race on site when the seat at home offers a much better view. Until that somehow changes, don't look for any changes to increase road courses anytime soon.
Reply
6-18-2009 @ 9:35PM
wfelch126 said...
leave new hampshire out of the discussion of losing a date we sell out are events unlike atlanta and michigan
Reply
6-18-2009 @ 10:12PM
Bob said...
I'll add another "Amen!" to that argument! If NASCAR wants to truly boast of having some of the best drivers in the world, then it should drive on the real driver tracks--road courses. Ovals not only put the fans to sleep, they put the DRIVERS to sleep. Why would anyone want to race for hours with the same two, three, or four curves, all in the same direction? Make 'em turn right a few times, with a totally different approach to every single corner, and sort out who can REALLY control a race car. And by all means, there should definitely be at least one road course in the chase. I'm with you wholeheartedly on this one, Holly!
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 9:57AM
mc90277 said...
Seriously, why not loose both Pocono races? It's like watching an all day dyno run. I'm sure the engine shops wouldn't mind.
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 11:46AM
mike said...
road courses? what a joke...i dont know a real nascar fan who likes those silly tracks..
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 1:35PM
CONNIE said...
I AGREE,I FIND THESE ROAD COURSES BORING,BUT THATS JUST ME!!
BUT I STILL LOVE NASCAR!!
BOOGETY,BOOGETY,BOOGETY,LETS GO RACING BOYS!!
6-19-2009 @ 1:42PM
melanie said...
real racers can drive on road courses,
it more of a challenge to see if they can really drive.must be a earnhardt fan
6-19-2009 @ 12:01PM
what up acres said...
NASCAR is so boring. IE Poco-Snooze. Michigan. Need a few more 1 mile tracks. Way too many cookie-cutter tracks, all the same etc. Heres an idea. Bring in X amount of tons of dirt for Darlington and "Dirt Race" for one of the last "Chase Races". Bring on the dirt!
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 12:29PM
illsell4u said...
If they were all 1 mile tracks would they not then be all the same? Just curious.
6-19-2009 @ 2:14PM
obamaizadope said...
a 3500 lb. stock car on a road course is like watching rosie odonnell dance in a ballet..ridiculous.
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 2:39PM
frobson said...
With over 50 years of road racing background, I hardly qualify as a NASCAR fan, except for the Sonoma and Watkins Glen races. But NASCAR has had road races for years. I'm probably one of the few race fans that saw NASCAR race at Bridgehampton in the early '60's. These were still "stock" cars. Relatively skinny tires, suspensions chained to limit lean on the right turns, really bad brakes etc. The race was held in conjunction with a SCCA National with Cobras (289's), Ferrari GT's and one GTO, along with several Corvette's etc. Within maybe 10 laps on a track that they had never seen, Petty, Fireball Roberts, and several others were faster than the sports cars. Unbelievable. Practice was hilarious as brakes faded, cars went into the sand banks, as well as several drivers that just never got out of second gear. But the race Sunday was very exciting and definitely not boring even though I could move to only four of the corners. For those not familiar with dear-departed Bridgehampton, the long front straight (upward of 160 mph in CAN-AM cars) ends in a reverse camber right hander that you can't see until you're on top of it as it drops rapidly downhill. The NASCAR guys had as many lines as there were drivers, but nobody backed off.
To make NASCAR more relevant, do away with the COT, run at least stock bodies on the tube frames ala Trans AM, and for heaven sake, go to FI. I have carbs on my vintage race cars, but no other series I'm familiar with uses carbs anymore. And BTW, for ease of adjustment, go to modern adjustable shocks. No need to keep a truck load of shocks to change out. Come on NASCAR, there are enough vintage race series, we don't need one more.
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 8:35PM
Hi there said...
Once again Dale Jr is in the back of the pack. 35th at Sonoma. Kyle Busch called that one correctly. Not only does Kyle win races, he also can see who does not have any talent on the track. I do feel for Jr nation. They can only cheer when the 88 car gets the lucky dog. When was the last time Jr raced to a win? Do not count his gas mileage win. I mean his last time he raced to a win? It was for DEI in the 8 car.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 1:23AM
Big Bad John said...
I would like to see more Road courses with Ford possibly going to race Mustangs in NASCAR next year it would be more to the advantage of the Ford teams to see maybe two more road courses in NASCAR,such as Road Atlanta.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 7:43AM
illsell4u said...
You do understand that the ONLY thing on the cars that is different is the name plate they stick on the cars don't you? The only difference between the FORD MUSTANG sitting next to the TOYOTA CAMRY is the fact that Ford pays to have MUSTANG while Toyota pays to have CAMRY put on the car for advertising purposes. The car is going to be EXACTLY the same Ford Fusion they are running now with a new name on it. Maybe the driver will think it is faster and be psyched into driver faster, LOL
6-20-2009 @ 7:17AM
james said...
i would like to see a couple more road course races, i think mid ohio and road atlanta would be cool tracks..."real" nascar fans know that nascar has a long history of road course races. i would like to see jimmie johnson win a road course race he is only a couple of pieces short of having the total package...a good 200 lap battle between jeff gordon and tony stewart would be cool too
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 7:20AM
kevcoracin said...
Why not use the Road Course at Daytona? With a few changes here and there you would have the balance of high speed banking, plenty of seats with a view of the track, great pit area, plenty of parking and put this Daytona Road Course as the last race of the Case. Now that I would pay to see.
Reply