Jeff Burton, Jimmie Johnson and every other leader in Saturday night's Bank of America 500 proved one thing: NASCAR's biggest trump card to winning a race is still the clean air a driver gets, and the timing of that can pretty much guarantee a particular race's winner.Of course, this isn't to rag on Jeff Burton or claim he secured an unjust victory because he certainly pulled out all of the stops with a great but risky call in the pits and holding off Jimmie Johnson for the lead as the laps wound down.
Instead, I'm just hoping that NASCAR is realizing how bitterly important the nose design on the Car of Tomorrow is, and how much it truly affects both the lead car and the trailing car.
For evidence, one only has to look so far as the laps led column from Saturday night's 334-lap race at Lowe's Motor Speedway. Five drivers -- Tony Stewart, Jeff Gordon, Jeff Burton, Brian Vickers and Jimmie Johnson -- led at least 42 laps in the event, with most of them coming on successive runs.
In particular, one example for how bad the new car designs handles in traffic was Greg Biffle's late race performance.
For much of the event, the No. 16 was in the Top-5 and at times had the fastest car on the race track. On the final stop, Biffle restarted fifth as the first car with four fresh tires, while Burton had taken gas only and the others had taken two.
Most felt, including Biffle who said over the radio that he "liked his chances", that at least some fresh tires -- two or four -- would overtake Burton over the final 33 circuits. Instead, the only challenge Burton got was from Johnson, who came out second after the last pit stop.
Another example? Jeff Gordon.
Gordon slapped the outside wall early in the race and had to pit out of sequence early in the event. He eventually got his lap back and came back up through the field. A pair of timely cautions helped Gordon -- who had been riding around 10th for many laps without making headway -- take the lead and suddenly become the fastest car on track thanks to clean air.
After another round of pit stops put Gordon in the lower Top-10, and he commented over the radio that his car was completely different from what it was just before the stop, and that being in traffic and without the clean air caused his car to be extremely tight. He talked about it after the race:
HOW IMPORTANT WAS CLEAN AIR? "I'm so frustrated with that. It's unbelievable how good my car drove out in front. It was on rails. And it was like having the best car, and then like having the worst car, when I was five or six cars back. [...]And if you don't believe those examples, just look at the huge leads that each leader was able to build on green flag runs Saturday night until they caught lapped traffic. No, it wasn't because each team truly hit the setup at that point, but rather it was because of the undisturbed air on the nose of the leader's car.
"If I could have got out front, I would have won the race. I mean, anybody who gets out front is going to win the race. It's ridiculous."
It's a millon dollar question in figuring out how to make the cars run better behind each other, but for the millions of dollars NASCAR handles every week, I'd say having race cars that can race with each other in close competition is highly important.
My first suggestion? Give up having the lapped-down cars start to the inside of the leaders on restarts, and instead, allow the leaders to bunch up in at least a single-file line, or ideally, a double-file line for restarts.
It won't solve the dirty air problem, but it will reduce the number of cars the leaders have to deal with, and will actually promote more close racing between the race's contenders, not its pretenders.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-12-2008 @ 8:15PM
Mike said...
I agree with you on the restart issue, Geoffrey. Earlier this year I questioned why it is that Nascar keeps this rule in place. With the new car and the difficulty they have in running in the diry air, this rule gives a huge advantage to whomever is in the lead on the restarts. While it would be nice of Nascar to come up with some adjustment to be made to the front of the cars to allow them to move better in the diry air, one way to improve things is to have all the restarts just like the start of the race. Why should the top drivers have to fight their way past back markers on a restart? When Nascar put the "lucky dog" in place they should have done away with having the lapped cars restart on the inside. This is just another case of Nascar giving handouts to the drivers do not deserve them and have not earned it. I get the feeling Brian France is one of those people that believes we should teach our children that there are no losers and everybody is a winner. I guess that is all well and good if you never had to apply for a job in the real world but when there may be 10 applicants for a job, and there is only ONE position open, try telling the 9 that did not get hired that there are no losers and everyone is a winner.
For much of the season though there has been an exception to the "I can't pass in dirty air" cry that most of the drivers have complaned about. That exception is Kyle Busch. While it pains me to do so, I have to point out that once again he had no problems kickin it to the front after finding himself in the back of the pack due to a pit road penalty.
MBL
Reply
10-12-2008 @ 9:22PM
annaseitter said...
THAT'S RIGHT MIKE: QUOTE; THE EXCEPTION IS KYLE BUSH
You got it. The kylie can drive in any condition and anything.
He doesn't make 100 of BS excuses on why he could not do this or that like most other drivers. He does not use a back UP book of blames to explain his poor performance like most other drivers do. I NOTICED IT LONG TIME AGO. THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS WHY HE HAS BEEN COMPARED TO DALE#3
on the track. works for me... even if now he is out of champ. contendion.
Reply
10-12-2008 @ 10:11PM
Mike said...
LOL, I didn't like Dale Sr either Anna.
Reply
10-13-2008 @ 5:46AM
annaseitter said...
lol,lol i already knew that mike, you made it pretty clear before.
that's why i mentioned him. lol.
Reply
10-13-2008 @ 8:57AM
Jack Hall said...
I agree Mike, cars a lap or more down should be BEHIND the lead lap cars on restarts. No reason for current style restart since the inception of the lucky dog rule.
Except in the event my driver is a lap down, then it should be as it is now.:-)
Reply
10-13-2008 @ 1:16PM
Stewart Fan said...
I agree with Mike about the restart.
The lucky dog rule bothers me in some cases. The rule was put in place for safety reasons only. I think there should be a limit to how many lucky dog's that you receive. Last year Kyle Busch received at least 10 lucky dog's in one race. If a team is sitting in the garage for a number of laps they should not be in contention for win because of lucky dogs.
It would also make my day to never again have to hear goofy Michael Waltrip say "Aaron's Lucky Dog".
Reply
10-13-2008 @ 7:34PM
DEBRA said...
WELL JESSICA SIMPSON PROBABLY JINXED THE RACE AND JR JUST LIKE SHE DOES TONY ROMO EVERYTIME SHE SHOWS UP AT A GAME-WHAT WAS SHE ALL SLUTTED UP IN JR CLOTHES FOR? TRYING TO LINE SOMETHING UP FOR WHEN TONY DUMPS HER? I KNOW JR LIKES BLEACHED BLONDES BUT I DON'T THINK HE LIKES THEM QUITE SO DUMB. HER AND ROWDY WOULD MAKE A GOOD COUPLE.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 12:30AM
Don Emerson said...
Good point. and suggestion Mike. I've never understood the restart rule in Nascar, it makes no sense. Here you are, a lapped driver, and the next thing you know you're racing along the leader with open track ahead of you. Another suggestion I would add is to cut the size of the field down to say 30 cars or so. This would get rid of the ones just taking up space and causing wrecks and free up sponsorship money for the guys who can produce results. Do away with ownership points and let everyone earn their spot in the field. Wouldn't that shake things up and add some excitement. It won't ever happen, but it sure works for me......
Reply
10-15-2008 @ 5:48PM
Jack Hall said...
Brillant Don, just brillant. What about the top 12 in the chase that cause wrecks? Whats your analysis on that?
Reply
10-16-2008 @ 9:39AM
Don Emerson said...
Why....thank you Jack, but perhaps brilliant is too strong a word to use....I prefer genius if you don't mind. And yes the top 12 do cause some wrecks, but not nearly at the rate of the also rans. Each week, at least one third of the field is nowhere near to being competitive, so let's cut the fat and stick to the meat of the matter. Works for me...........
Reply
10-16-2008 @ 12:09PM
Jack Hall said...
Yeah, I'm sure your analogy will come to pass. Good ideas like this one don't go away. Do you consider this idea to be as valid as your "pit on green only" philosphy?
Reply