OUR FANHOUSE TOOLBAR INTEGRATES THE LATEST SPORTS NEWS INTO YOUR WEB BROWSER AND INSTALLS IN SECONDS.
YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE TOOLBAR HERE.

Nascar and Racing

Edwards Draws Significant NASCAR Penalty

Carl Edwards' No. 99 Roush Fenway Ford may have won the UAW-Dodge 400 last Sunday at Las Vegas Motor Speedway, but NASCAR rained down heavily with penalties on Wednesday.

All of the fines and penalties come directly from Edwards' No. 99 failing post-race inspection due to a oil tank cover not in its correct position.

Edwards' Penalties Include:

  • 100 driver points
  • 100 owner points
  • 10-point Chase bonus for winning a race
  • Six week suspension for crew chief Bob Osbourne
  • $100,000 fine for Osbourne
  • Probation until Dec. 31 for Osbourne

The penalties given are quite similar to those the Dale Earnhardt Jr., Jimmie Johnson, and Jeff Gordon faced for Car of Tomorrow violations in 2007.

The penalty drops Edwards from first in the point standings to seventh, taking him out of first points lead in his Sprint Cup career.

NASCAR has a big problem with the oil tank cover being loose because in a Sprint Cup car, the oil tank sits in the car itself. Due to the car having a "dry sump oil system", that tank carries about five gallons of oil, and the tank cover is designed to keep that hot oil in and away from the driver in the event of a malfunction.

In theory, though I'm not completely sure how, the lack of a cover can also add downforce to the car because air can move between the oil tank cover area and the inside of the race car, making the car drive better around the track. Some articles after the race connected Jeff Gordon saying that "he just shot of a cannon" and the possibility that Edwards removed the cover himself during the race.

The plausibility of such an event seems a little out there.

I'd say its not very likely that the No. 99 went through pre-race inspection with the cover missing, so something went afoul at some point during the race.

Expect Edwards and Co. to appeal this penalty this week, especially with several Nationwide Series teams winning appeals from a similar problem during qualifying at Daytona.

A significant part of that ruling, I'd think, would have to be based on the fact that Edwards won a race with his problem, and those teams had their times disallowed prior to racing.

Related Articles

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)