Bruton Smith is a man who likes to grab attention.So last week when the Concord, N.C. City Council voted to change the zoning of Lowe's Motor Speedway to eliminate a possible drag strip, he swung back -- and connected.
The CEO of Speedway Motorsports declared that he was ready to spend over $350 million and completely rebuild a new version of Lowe's Motor Speedway in another Charlotte suburb. That left NASCAR fans (including diehard LMS fans like myself), Concord city leaders, and Cabarrus County leaders all saying the same thing.
"Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaattttt?!"
I personally can't imagine the 1.5-miler south of Concord on Highway 29 as a boarded up, non-used ruin. That would be a sad day, even if a newer facility was built
Fortunately, Concord has changed their mind, and Smith might be stepping down -- a little bit.
Specifically, council members voted Tuesday to ask the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider amending the speedway's zoning to allow drag strips on the property -- a use that the City Council unanimously banned just last week.In other words, Concord is getting out of their brain fade and realizing that no matter how bad it ethically seems, LMS does so much for the city and surrounding area that giving in is normally a better idea than not giving in.
Yes, you, as well as I, can start to breathe that slight sense of relief, for one of NASCAR's most-storied tracks is staying put for now.
At issue for Concord was Smith starting to play in the dirt on LMS property in what appears to be plans for a drag strip. Conveniently enough, the NHRA has left a spot open on their schedule in 2008 for such a venue.
Homeowners near LMS weren't exactly pleased that a drag strip (apparently, they're kind of loud) could be built pretty darn close to their backdoor and started complaining. Concord city leaders didn't like having their toes stepped on in the process, and so up went the zoning block last week in an emergency meeting.
It is ironic, however, that those same homeowners built homes in between the speedway and a very busy private airport. That doesn't give Smith's move more validity, though.
The controversy is at this point because Smith claimed it wasn't legal, hired a big-time attorney, and threw out some claims that scared the bejesus out of a lot people. Were they legitimate? Possibly, but they seem to be settling down a little bit.
And how convenient this was for Smith, as this weekend's Bank of America 500 at LMS is a tell-tale sign of the significant impact on the local economy. According to the Charlotte Observer, that figure is in the ballpark of $169 million per year to the economy. Think that made Concord leaders rethink their plans?
After all, I think that a few neighbors dealing with drag racing noises (behind sound barriers, mind you) for a few weekends a year is a little lower on the totem pole for the city and county than massive amounts of tourism revenue.
I think it's easy to say that at this point, so goes Lowe's Motor Speedway, so goes Concord and Cabarrus County.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-12-2007 @ 10:28AM
Maveness said...
While I have issues with Bruton not addressing pertinent concerns with people who live around the track (noise especially), he was going to win this one no matter what. LMS is the only track in the state. The Hall of Fame is coming here. The teams are here. NC as a state would do everything in their power to make sure that Bruton got what he wanted to keep the track close to Charlotte.
And quite frankly, is it fair to a whole new set of people who *didn't* voluntarily choose to live near a track to slap a big track and drag strip nearby because the state deemed it needed? The people throwing the biggest fit seem to be the ones who moved in after the speedway was built. I have little sympathy. Some, because their concerns over noise and traffic are valid, but those can be addressed logically, not by trying to get everything shut down after it was greenlit.
Reply
10-13-2007 @ 10:19AM
Kim said...
I agree completely. Instead of moving a beloved track, how about we build some more. If Nascar really wants to expand their fan base, then let's build some new tracks in states that have none, such as mine, Ohio. There are many Nascar fans all over the U.S. that don't have a track in their state or anywhere close to them. And if they do, such as Indianapolis is close to me, it's too expensive for us to travel or even attempt to get tickets to said tracks. As a fan that doesn't ever get to go to a track, I feel it's unfair that most tracks get at least two races per year. I am sure there are many other states that would be interested in building a track and attracting all the revenue that goes along with a Nascar race. Hmm....Maybe I will email my congressman!
Kim
Reply
10-13-2007 @ 10:58AM
Mtnskier said...
Seems like someone in Concord finally remembered how LMS ended up there in the first place. Bruton Smith's first choice (in the late 1950s) was close to Charlotte (in fact, now it's somewhat inner city Charlotte--the NE corner of Tryon and Sugar Creek). When he met resistance from the local powers that be, he moved just over the county line into Cabarrus County in spite. While that ultimately ended up being a good decision, all accounts point to it being made in anger.
Sad to see that this new drag strip had to be built to replace the strip at Rockingham. Though, I can understand the desire to build one, given the absolute success of the strip at Bristol. The Rock was a great place for both drag racing and stock cars, but was a sacrifice to the standardization of NASCAR.
Reply