NASCAR was flat out wrong Sunday night at Kansas Speedway. Watch the video, and then I'll tell you why.
They were wrong to award Greg Biffle his first win of the season because the "field was frozen at the point of yellow".
They were wrong to make such a blatant call without first reviewing any evidence. And most importantly, they were wrong in trying to cover up the move so quickly with answers that sounded more like excuses.
I've tossed and turned over this issue since the drop of the checkered flag and my NASCAR.com leaderboard service showed Clint Bowyer as the winner. Somehow, though, the images filtering through the screen and the words flying into my ears didn't render the same thing.
The fact is, though, Clint Bowyer won the LifeLock 400 and Greg Biffle finished fourth. The case is open and shut -- Greg Biffle did not remain at "cautious pace" during the final yellow and therefore should not be credited with doing so.
He did not maintain pace with the pace car as the rule states and everyone from Kansas to the Emerald City knows his reason for pulling low -- to maintain gas for burnouts -- was complete and utter bull.
Again, Greg Biffle didn't keep pace with the rest of the field and should not have been awarded the victory.
Somehow though NASCAR decided that a win can be fully decided by them, and not by the rule book -- which conveniently enough brings up another fact:
There is no trumping a NASCAR judgment call.
Is anybody else outraged from this? Does anybody legitimately care that at least three of the top-5 finishers (Bowyer, Jimmie Johnson, and Jeff Gordon) all agree that Biffle didn't keep pace? Isn't that a problem when even your competitors can't figure out how they can accurately win a race?
Does NASCAR care about their integrity? Have they ever?
I've sided with NASCAR for a long time on their arbitrary calls on penalties, infractions, and other stock car predicaments. It's always been "part of the sport" for me, but Sunday's race took it too far. To flub the end of a race and brainlessly cite a rule that doesn't even clear the picture is not the way to handle major league stock car racing.
It's not even the way host seven-year-old go-cart racing.
NASCAR has built themselves into a position now where its ridiculously easy to question the credibility of a call in the sport while at the same time trying to build themselves into a "major pro sport".
That doesn't work, and until they get that figured out, a lack of credibility may just be one significant reason NASCAR is no longer growing like it once was.
And potentially, and even more devastatingly, it's losing its fans that have really built the sport to where it is today.















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
10-02-2007 @ 7:12AM
Scott said...
Seems Geoffrey has his nads in a knot.
Refer to the following quote..."I've sided with NASCAR for a long time on their arbitrary calls on penalties, infractions, and other stock car predicaments."
Naturally, those who are not Roush fans would say NASCAR has "finally" crossed the line. Well, I say NASCAR crossed the line years ago!!
Hhhmmm...It's nice to see NASCAR's "arbitrary calls" go the way of Roush Fenway racing for once. Maybe this was payback for penalizing Carl E. for being an 1/8" to low, especially when everyone knows the rule was written for plate tracks and not short tracks.
Congratulations to Greg Biffle and Roush Fenway for winning 2 in a row!!
Reply
10-03-2007 @ 12:40PM
John Faber said...
How about Tony Stewart getting away with anything he feels like doing. He can wreck another car with intent in front of everyone and you do not hear a word from no one.Nascar is going down the tubes.They make up a new rule almost every week,when will they get the hint that they are loosing their fans over these things......
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 7:54AM
BUD said...
Hey Geoffery, go read rule book, make sure you understand it, then tell me what jimmie Johnson, Bowyer, did wrong, to the back of pack boys; field was frozen you passed each other then the leader, race finished under caution period. God you cry babies get on my nerves and Iam not even a Biffle fan.
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 8:15AM
Big Al said...
Geoffery, here's quarter and a towel. Jeffie, Jimmie and Bowyer are just of vultures trying to cheat (again) for a cheap win they didn't deserve anyway. Care about something that matters. By the way I had friend named Jimmie in the 3rd grade but he grew up and became Jim.
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 8:17AM
gene said...
nascar wouldn t dare mess with jack roush, they penalize jr. 100 points for putting the wrong bolt on the wing which in no way helps the car, then only penalize edwards 25 points for something that in no way helps the car, roush gets his way most of the time so there is no discussion here.
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 8:53AM
kkash said...
NASCAR is the New WWF - They couldn't wait 5 more minutes to finish 3 lousy laps? Then, once the race was called, the ABC announcers did a total 180 and started saying "well folks, the TV makes it look lighter then it really is out here" .. Come on .. All we need now is "Mean Gene" Okerlund and Jesse the Body and this sport will be complete!
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 8:59AM
Kim said...
Hey, lay off of Mr. Miller, please! His articles are always well written & he always has his facts straight!
I agree with you, Mr. Miller. What happened to a green white checker finish? It was clear Biffle ran out of gas. What were the others, Boyer, Johnson, & Gordon supposed to think when he (Biffle) dropped down to the apron and clearly allowed the pace car to pass him because he ran out of gas? The field might have been frozen, but the rule book that you above me are so nastily saying Mr. Miller doesn't check (which I assure you, he does) says that the cars must maintain speed with the pace car. Biffle did not do that, so he should not have been the winner. On the last lap before the caution came out, it was clear Biffle was losing steam as Johnson was actually the one who ran the fastest lap right before the caution came out. The rule book also states that a green white checker will be attempted to give the fans what they paid for....a real finish, not some dumb yellow flag, following behind the pace car finish. Biffle didn't even make it across the finish line. Did you all not hear the fans booing at the finish of the race? I mean these people paid a lot of money to see a real chase race that was a crock! Biffle isn't in the chase, Boyer, Johnson, & Gordon are. They should have been given the chance to try to place better one more lap of green flag racing.
I am with Mr. Miller, Boyer & Johnson on this one. That race was the worst Nascar race I have ever seen. There were flagrant infractions by other drivers during the race, namely Tony Stewart, which apparently went unnoticed, (why was he not black flagged when it was clear he had a tire going down, which would cause a wreck) not to mention again the lack of a real green white checker finish. Nascar is the one that needs to go back and check their rule book, not Mr. Miller!
Kim
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 9:27AM
Sandie said...
I agree with Mr. Miller and Kim. I for one would like to know how Tony Stewart gets by with all the rule infractions he has every week. Yes, Tony Stewart should have been black flagged. Mr. Miller checks his facts and writes "great" articles every week.
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 9:51AM
CJ said...
I agree whole-heartedly with this complete article. I truely love this sport, moreso than any other including football, but it just makes me sick to my stomach when i think of the injustice that happened on Sunday and how Nascar claimed that it was not trying to cheat the fans with the extensive drying of the track only to have the crap end like that. And it's nothing against Greg Biffle, but had he had a flat tire, would they have said the same? He says he had plenty of gas and that he would prove them wrong by goin and doin a burnout, but i never saw one and never heard of one being done either. The only reason i didnt want Biffle to win is so he'd leave Roush for a team that'll give him what it takes to show his true potential, something Roush has no interest in doing. I think it would have been better off if they had just called the race when it was over halfway and the rains came. The situation was much worse than it was at Pocono, yet they didnt hesitate to call that race so damn quick. All i know is i think there has to be some type of better way to do things. Although it's a lil different, in the NFL in a game, a coach has the opportunity to question a call by using a challenge, yet there is nothing to do in this sport. I think a easy solution for this would be if you had a minimum of three crew chiefs that wanted to team up and call a, let's just say "Nascar challenge, which you'd get in this situation with Bowyer's, Johnson's and Gordon's, and they take the crew chiefs to show them the car and that there was gas in it, it would drop the whole mess, but Nascar thinks their word should be good enough. It may work for some idiots, but it doesnt work for me.
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 10:03AM
L Wood said...
NASCAR is now a joke. I'm losing interest even though my favorite driver is in the top two cars in the Chase. France, Hilton and others at the top are whimps.
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 10:18AM
Tara said...
On Claire B's XM show yesterday afternoon, she read the rule regarding the speed. It actually says that the car must maintain a "reasonable" speed. It does not actually say that the car must keep up with the pace car. This basically means, right, wrong, or indifferent, that it was at NASCAR's discretion to determine whether or not Greg kept a "reasonable" speed.
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 10:33AM
Maveness said...
I'm sorry, but I have to respectfully disagree for a few reasons.
1. Unless you have a copy of the rule book (which, from what I understand, even the media can't get hold of), the wording of the rule is up for debate.
2. If NASCAR truly went by past history (from this year alone), Tony Stewart would have run the race because NASCAR usually doesn't restart a red flagged race if they can't finish teh entire thing. (We all know the only reason they restarted it was because it's a Chase race.)
3. The competitors in question who were happy to argue that Biffle didn't win? Had points to gain in the Chase and would have lost even more points if the race had ended at the red flag. Notice which scenario they were arguing for.
The race was already out of the ordinary. NASCAR had already broken all their own rules. Saying Bowyer won over Biffle is pretty much a moot point because the whole thing was already suspect.
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 10:43AM
Ricticassee said...
This could have been far, far different...they could have realized that the rain couldn't be dried away to allow any more than a few laps WHILE IT WAS STILL RAINING, and given the win to Tony.
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 10:46AM
drgrcr601 said...
Right or wrong Nascar gave the race to Biffle when they threw the yellow and even announced it as such. I can guarantee one thing. Posters who agree with Geoffery would have a different opinion if it was their driver in Biffle's place. Right Kim?
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 10:48AM
gene said...
hey Big AL as far as gordon being a cry baby about this he said he didn t want bowyer to win because it would help bowyer in the points, but gordon said clealy biffle ran out of gas and could not maintain pace car speed. No matter who your favorite driver is at some point nascar has screwed them over by changing the rules whenever
they want.
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 11:09AM
kate said...
I think this race just highlights the fact that in order for NASCAR to continue its growth and compete with those stick and ball sports they must have an detailed rule book which can be viewed by the fans and the media. They can no longer have sweeping rules like "actions detrimental to nascar." They must have rules that have a corresponding fine/points reduction/suspension. You cannot constantly deduct points at will or decide races on whim. Whether Biffle won or not, you have to have concrete rationale to defend your actions. NASCAR does not have that.
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 11:05AM
grapevinesooner said...
I don't have a problem with Nascar eschewing a GWC in favor of safety. It kind of amazes me that Kansas Speedway is a cookie-cutter track with no lights, but that's for another discussion.
Point is, Nascar penalized Robby Gordon in August at Montreal for 'failure to maintain a cautious speed' after he got spun out by Marcos Ambrose. Sunday, their interpretation of that rule changes to 'well, the field's automatically frozen when the yellow comes out.'
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 1:12PM
Maveness said...
Grapevine - there's one significant difference between Robby and Biffle, though. In RObby's case, he was part of a wreck and stopped. Biffle wasn't part of the caution and never stopped.
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 12:03PM
ronpannell said...
i am the man thats nascars theme dont like it go elsewhere. bruton smith has enough race tracks to start a good series. do it bruton
Reply
10-02-2007 @ 1:15PM
Mike said...
As I did not get the benefit of seeing exactly what happened, and as Nascar does not see fit to allow ANYONE except themselves to see the rule book, it is hard for me to comment on what happened and the ruling. I do agree with Kate in what she says. If Nascar wants to be considered a "real sport" they need to publish rules that all the "athletes", the media, and the fans can hold up to the light of day, and give the sniff test to so we can see if those rules are being applied equally. Even soccer and ice hockey have rules, nobody knows what they are but they do have them.
Everybody rags on the COT as being all identicle. Well boo hoo to that. All ball sports play with the same ball. The difference is the player and the coach, not the ball. Nascar should be no different if you are going to call it a sport. In my opinion, as it is now, since the cars are different it is the cars that are the athletes.
I once raced motocross for one year before I learned I was NOT nearly good enough. While it is FAR FAR more physically demanding than NASCAR I did not consider myself an athlete.
Reply