OUR FANHOUSE TOOLBAR INTEGRATES THE LATEST SPORTS NEWS INTO YOUR WEB BROWSER AND INSTALLS IN SECONDS.
YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE TOOLBAR HERE.

Nascar and Racing

Rubbin' is Racin': Fans v. Ginn Racing

Ginn Racing's decision to cut veterans Joe Nemechek and Sterling Marlin was "sponsor driven." I suspect that the majority of fans accept that. That doesn't mean we to have to like it. And we don't:
Both Marlin and Nemechek are among the most popular drivers in the Nextel Cup garage. When word of their firings became public yesterday, internet message boards lit up with comments critical of Ginn Racing. Ginn's own Fan Forum was shut down late Tuesday, after fans clogged it with scathing criticism of the team.
Where is the respect for our elders?
It's hard not to be critical of a team firing two veteran drivers maintaining position in the top 35 in owner points in the middle of the season. But the move is far from surprising--with change in ownership usually comes a change in key personnel.

Bobby Ginn could have fired Marlin and Nemechek when he first took majority interest in MB2 Motorsports. Apparently, it took him a year to determine that the future of his company lies not in experience of aging leftovers, but in the promise of youth.

The team is at least grateful:
"We appreciate everything that Joe and Sterling have done for us. They have been a class act."
Whoop dee doo.

Is Ginn a class act?

NASCAR fans aren't the only ones mad at Ginn. Investors of Ginn's real estate ventures have filed a class action lawsuit alleging they were misled and defrauded in property purchases:
[The lot owners] say they are entitled to and they are demanding rescission of the contracts and that Ginn repurchase the properties and reimburse them for all carrying costs.

The plaintiffs believe all Ginn affiliated entities were set up and run for the exclusive purpose of raising money from unsuspecting purchasers, like plaintiffs, for the benefit of Ginn and its affiliates.

The suit further alleges that Ginn created a complicated maze of companies to be used in marketing, soliciting and promoting properties to potential purchaser in order to avoid scrutiny of U.S. regulators.

According to the suit, Ginn, at the same time, perpetuated a "ponzi scheme" in which returns to investors were not financed through the success of the underlying business venture, but were taken from principal sums of newly attracted purchasers such as plaintiffs.

These are just allegations, of course, but it's not just one person saying it ... it's 99 of them saying they've been had. I've suddenly become quite skeptical of the way Ginn does business. What about you?

NASCAR has sold out
Regardless of Ginn's business practices, the inability to secure sponsorship for Nemechek and Marlin underscores a bigger issue of how dependent upon marketing the sport has become. But we knew that already. Oftentimes the NASCAR community benefits from the emphasis on marketing. Not this time. Or so it seems today. The future is still bright for Regan Smith and Aric Almirola.

What others are thinking
Ginn decision a shame
Kyle Petty and Harry Gant's 2 Cents about Ginn Racing
You have to feel for Marlin and Nemechek
Change is hard, if inevitable

Previously on Fanhouse
Almirola Bails on Gibbs, Headed to Ginn
DEI Ginn Merger 2007 and Beyond
Ginn Racing Downsizing to One Cup Team?

Related Articles

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

GOT SOMETHING TO SAY?